Revenue Assurance as a Service
Find leakage. Prove controls. Keep the evidence moving every month.
Find the leakage, & prove the controls every month.
Most MVNOs and many telecom businesses know they need revenue assurance. Far fewer are ready to buy, implement, and operate a full revenue assurance platform.
Revenue Assurance as a Service is the smaller commitment that gets the work started: a baseline review, evidence-led findings, a practical control plan, and a retained monthly cadence that keeps revenue, settlement, and operational exceptions visible.
Who it is for
For teams that need evidence before they need another system.
This service is for businesses that need clearer revenue evidence but do not want to start with a software procurement. It is especially relevant when revenue depends on host-network settlement, recharge, bundles, advances, partner reporting, customer treatment, wholesale terms, or manual finance processes.
- MVNOs and digital brands trying to understand leakage after launch.
- Bank MVNOs that need finance, risk, audit, product, and operations to trust the mobile model.
- MVNEs and wholesale businesses managing partner brands, settlement, and tenant boundaries.
- Operators reviewing new propositions, partner models, or migration impact.
- Investors and transaction teams testing whether revenue assumptions are supportable.
The questions it answers
The questions arrive before the evidence does.
- “Are we billing, charging, advancing, and settling what we think we are?”
- “Where does revenue fall between product, network, channel, payment, partner, and finance?”
- “Which controls are real, and which only exist as process assumptions?”
- “Can finance, risk, audit, and operations see the same evidence?”
- “Which leakage risks need platform change, and which need operating discipline?”
- “What should we review monthly so the same issues do not reappear?”
Baseline first
Start with a baseline, not a platform commitment.
The first step is a focused baseline. We look at the revenue paths that matter most, the data and evidence available today, the settlement and reconciliation points, the operating controls, and the exceptions already visible in the business.
The output is not a generic audit document. It is a practical view of where leakage may exist, what evidence supports the finding, what needs deeper review, and what the business should control next.
Baseline outputs
- Revenue path map
- Settlement and reconciliation review
- Control evidence view
- Known exception list
- Leakage hypothesis and priority areas
- Recommended monthly cadence
- Platform enablement considerations, where relevant
Monthly service cadence
Then keep a monthly evidence cadence.
Revenue assurance only creates value if the business keeps looking. The retained service gives teams a recurring cadence for evidence review, leakage follow-up, control improvement, and management reporting.
The cadence is shaped around the maturity of the business. Some teams need a light monthly review. Others need a deeper operating rhythm across finance, operations, product, partner management, and technology.
- 01Review.Priority revenue paths and exceptions across product, network, channel, payment, partner, and finance.
- 02Test.Settlement, reconciliation, and control evidence. What holds up under scrutiny and what doesn’t.
- 03Track.Leakage hypotheses and confirmed findings, with owners and recovery measures.
- 04Assign.Action owners and follow-up items across finance, operations, product, partner management, and technology.
- 05Produce.A monthly evidence pack for finance, risk, audit, product, and operations.
- 06Escalate.Platform or operating-model constraints when the evidence supports it.
What you receive
Evidence your teams can use.
The aim is to make assurance visible enough for decisions. The service should help the business see whether a problem is caused by process, partner terms, data quality, product configuration, settlement, charging, or a platform constraint.
- Revenue leakage baseline
- Monthly revenue assurance evidence pack
- Control and exception register
- Settlement and reconciliation observations
- Root-cause and action tracking
- Management summary for finance, risk, operations, and product
- Recommendations for process, governance, partner terms, or platform enablement
Where platform may help
If the evidence points to platform change, we connect the next step.
Not every revenue assurance finding needs a new system. Some need better governance, clearer ownership, improved reconciliation, cleaner partner terms, or a stronger operating cadence.
When the evidence shows a platform constraint, TAUSPACE can connect the service to fullCIRCLE NEXT, Advance.ME, CVM, digital BSS, charging and policy, or a relevant suite. The platform conversation starts from evidence, not from assumption.
Engagement shape
Three engagements, one running service.
Baseline
Focused review of revenue paths, settlement points, control evidence, and known exceptions.
Monthly cadence
Recurring review, evidence pack, action tracking, and management summary.
Deeper support
Targeted workstreams for complex leakage, partner disputes, operating-model fixes, or platform enablement.
The service is sized to the operation, not to a fixed package. Start with a baseline. Use the findings to decide the right monthly cadence.
Related advisory and platform paths
Where this connects.
Start with the baseline.
If revenue, settlement, recharge, advances, partner reporting, or control evidence are difficult to see clearly, start with a focused baseline. It will show where to look, what to prove, and whether the next step is process, governance, partner action, or platform enablement.